Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Zormati v. New York Life Insurance Co. et al
as 1:2013cv04543
Plaintiff:
Bedis Zormati
Defendant:
New York Life Insurance Co., New York Life Insurance and Annuity Corp., NYLife Insurance Co. of Arizona and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Chenensky v. New York Life Insurance Co.
as 13-1458
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Brian Chenensky, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
John Does, 150 (said names being fictitious individuals) and ABC Corporations, 150 (said names being fictitious companies, partnership, joint ventures and/or corporation)
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
New York Life Insurance Co., New York Life Insurance and Annuity Corp., NYLife Insurance Co. of Arizona and others
Chenensky v. New York Life Insurance Co.
as 13-1284
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Brian Chenensky, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
New York Life Insurance Co., New York Life Insurance and Annuity Corp., NYLife Insurance Co. of Arizona and others
Johnson et al v. New York Life Insurance Co. et al
as 1:2013cv01832
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Sweet , Ricard L. Torres , Ricard L. Torres, II and others
Defendant:
New York Life Insurance Co. , New York Life Insurance and Annuity Corp. , NYLife Insurance Co. of Arizona and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gold et al v. New York Life Insurance CO. et al
as 1:2009cv03210
Plaintiff:
Avraham Gold, Avraham Gold, Avraham Gold and others
Defendant:
New York Life Insurance CO., New York Life Insurance and Annuity Corp., NYLife Insurance Co. of Arizona and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
