Cases 1 - 10 of 17
NEWELL v. MYERS et al
as 1:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER NEWELL
Defendant:
WARDEN DARREN MYERS, LT WILLIAMS, P/A BRADFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newell v. Fikes
as 2:2022cv00053
Petitioner:
Carlos Rodriguez Newell
Respondent:
Warden J. Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wiley v. United States of America et al
as 2:2021cv00125
Plaintiff:
Sean T. Wiley
Defendant:
United States of America, Correction Officer Newel, Dr. Chadick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newell v. Lumpkin Co.
as 2:2021cv00243
Plaintiff:
Anthony Glenn Newell
Defendant:
Lumpkin Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newell v. Brooks
as 1:2019cv01436
Petitioner:
Torrey Newell
Respondent:
Nathan Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Newell v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv01422
Defendant:
Warden Telfair State Prison, Fulton County, Georgia Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Torrey Newell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newell v. Brooks
as 3:2019cv00026
Petitioner:
Torrey Newell
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Respondent:
Nathan Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Newell v. Telfair State Prison et al
as 3:2019cv00022
Defendant:
Fulton County, Telfair State Prison, Georgia Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Torrey A. Newell and Torrey Newell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maher v. Adams et al
as 6:2018cv00134
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Brian Adams, CERT Sgt. Freddie Davis, Sgt. Michael Mendez and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Trouble Maher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newell v. United States of America
as 1:2018cv04499
Respondent:
Jeff Sessions and United States of America
Petitioner:
Carlos Newell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
