Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Newsome v. Hendrix et al
as 3:2021cv01706
Plaintiff:
Phillip Newsome
Defendant:
DeWayne Hendrix and FCI Sheridan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01572
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00726
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Francisco v. City of Albany, Oregon et al
as 6:2017cv01057
Defendant:
Justin Alexander, City of Albany, Oregon, Joe Clausen and others
Plaintiff:
Pablo Sebastian Francisco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newsome v. Amsberry
as 2:2017cv00446
Respondent:
Brigitte Amsberry
Petitioner:
Ryan C. Newsome
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newsome v. USA
as 3:2016cv01274
Petitioner:
Brandon Michael Newsome
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Newsome v. State of Oregon - Oregon Health Authority
as 3:2016cv00561
Plaintiff:
Eluid Newsome
Defendant:
State of Oregon - Oregon Health Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
York et al v. Peters et al
as 6:2013cv00676
Defendant:
Rick Coursey, Dr. Joseph H. Diehl M.D., Corrections Officer Endersby and others
Plaintiff:
Brian William York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CBT Nuggets, Inc. v. PC Tech 101 et al
as 6:2007cv06229
Plaintiff:
CBT Nuggets, Inc.
Defendant:
PC Tech 101, Dennis Newsome and Love of Scents
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Newsome v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 3:2007cv00861
Plaintiff:
Carol A. Newsome
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
