Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Best Buy Co., Inc. et al v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2010cv04572
Plaintiff:
Best Buy Co., Inc. , Best Buy Purchasing LLC , Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc. and others
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
TracFone Wireless, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv03205
Plaintiff:
Tracfone Wireless, Inc.
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc., Chi Mei Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Electrograph Systems, Inc. et al v. Epson Imaging Devices Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv00117
Not Classified By Court:
Viewsonic Corporation and Nassau Suffolk Lumber & Supply
Special Master:
Martin Quinn
Defendant:
Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, CMO Japan CO., LTD, Toshiba Matsushita Display Technology, LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas C. Giordan, Electrograph Technologies, Corp. and Electrograph Systems, Inc.
Claimant:
State Board of Equalization of the State of California
Intervenor:
NEC LCD Technologies, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Motorola, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv05840
Plaintiff:
Motorola, Inc., Motorola, Inc., Motorola, Inc. and others
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc., Chi Mei Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
AT&T Mobility LLC et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv04997
Plaintiff:
AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Mobility LLC and others
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, Au Optronics Corporation America, Inc, Chi Mei Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
ATS Claim, LLC v. Epson Electronics America, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv01115
Plaintiff:
ATS Claim, LLC
Defendant:
Epson Electronics America, Inc., Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
