Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Michael Tatro v. Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc., et al
as 19-56002
Defendant:
CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A., a National Banking Association, TRANSUNION INTERACTIVE, INC., a California company, VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., a New York corporation and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TARGET CORPORATE SERVICES, INC., a Minnesota corporation, MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS, INC., a New York corporation and FDS BANK, FSB, a Federal Savings Bank
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL P. TATRO
Tatro v. Sterling Jewelers Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01305
Defendant:
Sterling Jewelers Inc., T-Mobile, USA, Inc., Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Tatro
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Nextel Communications of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board of Ross Township
as 3:2014cv02409
Plaintiff:
Nextel Communications of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc.
Defendant:
Zoning Hearing Board of Ross Township
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332
Johnson v. Nextel Communications Inc.
as 13-3862
Petitioner:
Nextel Communications Inc., a Delaware Corporation
Respondent:
Michael S. Johnson, individually and on behalf of the class, Donna Dymkowski, individually and on behalf of the class, Patricia Long Correa, individually and on behalf of the class and others
VERIZON PENNSYLVANIA LLC et al v. SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P. et al
as 1:2013cv00979
Plaintiff:
VERIZON PENNSYLVANIA LLC , VERIZON NEW JERSEY, INC. , VERIZON DELAWARE LLC and others
Defendant:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P., SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P., AMERICAN PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
THE ESTATE OF H. FRED CLARK v. THE TORONTO DOMINION BANK et al
as 2:2012cv06259
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF H. FRED CLARK
Defendant:
THE TORONTO DOMINION BANK , TD BANK, N.A. , T-MOBILE USA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA v. Sprint/ Nextel Communications Cellular Phone, No. 714-476-7459
as 3:2012mc00472
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Sprint/ Nextel Communications Cellular Phone, No. 714-476-7459
Nextel Communications of the Mid Atlantic, Inc. v. Zoing Hearing board of Ross Township
as 3:2011cv01827
Plaintiff:
Nextel Communications of the Mid Atlantic, Inc.
Defendant:
Zoing Hearing board of Ross Township
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332
Southern New England Telephone v. Palermino
as 11-2714
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Southern New England Telephone Company, DBA AT&T, Connecticut
Defendant - Appellee:
Anthony J. Palermino, Commisioner, Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control, Kevin M. DelGobbo, Commisioner, Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control, John W. Betoski, III, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control and others
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Comcast Phone of Connecticut, Inc., Cablevision Lightpath - Connecticut, Inc. and Cox Connecticut Telecom, LLC
Southern New England Telephone v. Palermino
as 11-2332
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Southern New England Telephone Company, DBA AT&T, Connecticut
Defendant:
MetroPCS New York, LLC., Sprint Communications, L.P., Sprint Spectrum, L.P. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Anthony J. Palermino, Commisioner, Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control, Kevin M. DelGobbo, Commisioner, Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control and John W. Betoski, III, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
