Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Palacios v. Potter County Detention Facility, et al
as 2:2025cv00129
Plaintiff:
Jose Raul Palacios and Jose Raul Rivas
Defendant:
Potter County Detention Facility, Turn Key Medical, NFN Trevino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Damond Mosley v. TDCJ Officials, et al
as 20-10699
Defendant / Appellee:
NFN Owens, Health Administrator at John Middleton Unit, S. Gillette, Administrator Health Records at Form Unit, TDCJ Officials and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Damond Undray Mosley
Mosley v. TDCJ Officials et al
as 5:2020cv00093
Plaintiff:
Damond Undray Mosley
Defendant:
TDCJ Officials, Staff of Texas Tech Administration, NFN Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keys v. The United States of America et al
as 3:2017cv02940
Plaintiff:
Clay C Keys
Defendant:
The United States of America, The Department of Justice, DJ Harmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thibodeaux v. Baker
as 3:2016cv02149
Petitioner:
Paul Dewayne Thibodeaux
Respondent:
NFN Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Torres v. Baker
as 3:2016cv00917
Petitioner:
Paul Torres
Respondent:
NFN Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ward v. Gomez et al
as 2:2012cv00073
Plaintiff:
Brian Ward
Defendant:
Gary Gomez, Randall Sims, NFN Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Adams et al
as 2:2009cv00278
Plaintiff:
David Lopez
Defendant:
NFN Adams, NFN Baker, NFN Sloan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Gomez et al
as 2:2009cv00204
Plaintiff:
Brian De Ward
Defendant:
Gary Gomez, NFN Morales, NFN Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Revel et al
as 2:2009cv00147
Plaintiff:
Steve Green
Defendant:
NFN Revel, M Holligan, NFN Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
