Cases 1 - 10 of 103
Cleary v. NLN
as 3:2024cv02644
Defendant:
NFN NLN
Plaintiff:
Scott Allen Cleary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffery v. NLN
as 3:2024cv02144
Plaintiff:
Denisia Jeffery
Defendant:
NFN NLN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grizzle v. Smith Unit Mailroom Staff et al
as 5:2024cv00187
Defendant:
NFN NLN 524CV187, Smith Unit Mailroom Staff and NFN Rebber
Plaintiff:
Robert Grizzle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perales Trevino v. NLN
as 24-10411
Plaintiff:
Richard Alexander Peral Trevino, Jr. and Richard Alexander Perales Trevino, Jr.
Defendant:
NFN NLN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01781
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Sharpless v. NLN
as 3:2023cv01779
Petitioner:
Dennis Clay Sharpless
Respondent:
NFN NLN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2023cv01368
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID, R Bowers, NFN Wonders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 23-10287
Petitioner / Appellant:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, R. Bowers, Sr Warden, NFN Wonders and others
Salazar v. Unknown Police Dog Handler (K-9), et al
as 5:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Ryan C. Salazar
Defendant:
Dog Handler NFN NLN 5:23-CV-054, Lubbock County Sheriffs Office (SWAT), Lubbock County Sheriffs Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
