Cases filed in Maryland
Cases 31 - 40 of 81
Baibos v. Connectyourcare, LLC
as 1:2017cv00080
Plaintiff: Nichole Baibos
Defendant: Connectyourcare, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hare v. Nichols We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2016cv03321
Plaintiff: Delfon L Hare, Sr.
Defendant: Philip C. Nichols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hare v. Shim et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2016cv03296
Plaintiff: Delfon Lebrew Hare, Sr.
Defendant: Jae B. Shim, Antonio Hill, Harold Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. Warden
as 8:2016cv02804
Plaintiff: Anthony Nichols
Defendant: Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. Oakley et al
as 1:2016cv00870
Plaintiff: Anthony Nichols
Defendant: Scott Oakley, Dayena Corcoran, Schmitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adkins et al v. Kellogg Brown & Root, LLC et al
as 8:2015cv04020
Plaintiff: Terry Ennis Adkins, Issac Aguilar, Sevim Aybulut and others
Defendant: Kellogg Brown & Root LLC, KBR Inc, Kellogg Brown & Root Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Acosta et al v. Kellogg Brown & Root LLC, et al.
as 8:2015cv03836
Plaintiff: Ronald Layne Smith, Ryan C. Rasmussen, Reginald J. Belton and others
Defendant: KBR Inc, Kellogg Brown & Root LLC, Halliburton Company and others
Receiver: Jimmy Dwayne Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nichols v. Corcoran We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00690
Plaintiff: Anthony Nichols
Defendant: Dayena Corcoran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoffman et al v. Ellison et al
as 1:2015cv00468
Plaintiff: LeAnn M. Hoffman , Aaron W. Hoffman and Michalah M. Hoffman
Defendant: Nichole L. Ellison and Mariah G. Melber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Perez et al
as 8:2015cv00017
Petitioner: Nichole Williams
Respondent: Thomas E. Perez, Gary A. Steinberg and Angela Winn
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 151

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?