Cases 1 - 10 of 13
WIGGINS v. NJ STATE PAROLE BOARD
as 1:2023cv20921
Petitioner:
ERIC D. WIGGINS
Respondent:
NJ STATE PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HANDY v. NJ STATE PAROLE BOARD et al
as 1:2023cv02390
Plaintiff:
AARON HANDY, JR.
Defendant:
NJ STATE PAROLE BOARD and MICHAEL SCHREIBER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARRETT v. NJ STATE PAROLE BOARD et al
as 3:2022cv06611
Plaintiff:
ALLEN DUPREE GARRETT
Defendant:
NJ STATE PAROLE BOARD and NJ DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STOKES v. NJ DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2021cv18035
Petitioner:
JAQUAR STOKES
Respondent:
NJ DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and NJ STATE PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ALFORD v. WISENHOWER et al
as 1:2017cv06259
Plaintiff:
CRAIG ALFORD
Defendant:
WISENHOWER, TAYLOR, CAMDEN COUNTY HALL OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALFORD v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2017cv05611
Petitioner:
CRAIG ALFORD
Respondent:
KAREN TAYLOR, NJ STATE PAROLE BOARD and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALFORD v ULMER
as 3:2015cv02638
Plaintiff:
CRAIG ALFORD
Defendant:
EMT AGENT ULMER and NJ STATE PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NERI v. BEUCHELE et al
as 1:2014cv07656
Petitioner:
PHILIP G. NERI
Respondent:
NJ STATE PAROLE BOARD and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. NJ STATE PAROLE BOARD
as 3:2014cv06071
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE JOHNSON
Defendant:
NJ STATE PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KRUPP v. NJ STATE PAROLE BOARD
as 3:2013cv07777
Petitioner:
OTTO KRUPP
Respondent:
NJ STATE PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
