Cases 1 - 10 of 10
NOBLE ROMAN'S, INC. v. AMI STORES MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv01539
Defendant:
AMI 63 LLC D/B/A AMI 63 FOOD MART, AMI STORES MANAGEMENT, INC., AMI 57 LLC D/B/A AMI 70 FOOD MART and others
Plaintiff:
NOBLE ROMAN'S, INC.
Counter Claimant:
AMI 57 LLC and AMI 63 LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NOBLE ROMANS, INC. v. GATEWAY TRIANGLE CORP. et al
as 1:2021cv00307
Defendant:
NORTHLAKE MARKETING, LLC, 7405 INDY CORP., GATEWAY TRIANGLE CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
NOBLE ROMANS, INC.
Counter Defendant:
PAUL MOBLEY and TROY BRANSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NOBLE ROMAN'S, INC. v. CITY CENTER FOOD CORP., INC.
as 1:2009cv01268
Plaintiff:
NOBLE ROMAN'S, INC.
Defendant:
CITY CENTER FOOD CORP., INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
NOBLE ROMAN'S, INC. v. MARDAN, INC.
as 1:2009cv00884
Plaintiff:
NOBLE ROMAN'S, INC.
Defendant:
MARDAN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
NOBLE ROMAN'S, INC. v. WILLIAMS
as 1:2009cv00846
Plaintiff:
NOBLE ROMAN'S, INC.
Defendant:
RENTON WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Noble Roman's Inc. v. P & P Gas, LLC
as 3:2009cv00013
Plaintiff:
Noble Roman's Inc. and Noble Roman's Inc.
Defendant:
P & P Gas, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NOBLE ROMAN'S, INC. v. PARDIS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
as 1:2008cv01502
Plaintiff:
NOBLE ROMAN'S, INC.
Defendant:
PARDIS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NOBLE ROMAN'S INC. v. JAY'S GAS LLC
as 1:2008cv01348
Plaintiff:
NOBLE ROMAN'S INC.
Defendant:
JAY'S GAS LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NOBLE ROMAN'S, INC. v. RAHIMIAN
as 1:2008cv00463
Plaintiff:
NOBLE ROMAN'S, INC.
Defendant:
SHAHRAM RAHIMIAN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Noble Roman's Inc v. RH Inc et al
as 1:2007cv00077
Plaintiff:
Noble Roman's Inc
Defendant:
Simran & Braeden Inc and Simran & Braeden Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
