Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 236
Nolan v. Mazza
as 2:2024cv00061
Petitioner: Timothy Nolan
Respondent: Warden Kevin Mazza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker, Jr. v. Nolan et al
as 1:2024cv00180
Plaintiff: Donald Walker, Jr.
Defendant: Attorney Tim Nolan, Attorney Leon Hewitt, Austin Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Nolan v. USA
as 1:2024cv00052
Petitioner: Adrian Nolan
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Almasy, et al. v. Norfolk Southern Corporation, et al.
as 4:2024cv00452
Plaintiff: Patricia Almasy, Nina Aquino, Raeann Bankston and others
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Corporation, Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Oxy Vinyls, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Anthony Cain v. Thomas Evans, et al
as 24-5194
Plaintiff: ANTHONY CAIN, aka Jeffery Johnson
Defendant: THOMAS EVANS, Sergeant, DANA PENNIGER, Lieutenant, JORDAN KIESTER, Lieutenant and others
Mollkoy et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03651
Plaintiff: Nolan Mollkoy, Jr. and Barbara Loving
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Easley v. Nolan et al
as 3:2023cv01756
Plaintiff: David Easley
Defendant: Aaron J. Nolan, Robia Jones-Barringer, Lucas County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00234
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
USA v. Michael Slone
as 23-5677
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: MICHAEL NOLAN SLONE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00729
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?