Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Belfer Cosmetics, LLC v. Nordstrom, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00683
Plaintiff:
Belfer Cosmetics, LLC
Defendant:
Nordstrom, Inc. and Erno Laszlo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Horrilleno et al v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv01114
Counter Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank, N.A. and Trans Union, LLC
Defendant:
BMO Harris Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N. A., CFNA Receivables (TX), Inc. and others
Counter Defendant:
Alma Horrilleno, Henry Horrilleno and Henry Horrilleno
Plaintiff:
Alma Horrilleno and Henry Horrilleno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
eDekka LLC v. Nordstrom, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00120
Plaintiff:
eDekka LLC
Defendant:
Nordstrom, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
E2E Processing Inc v. Nordstrom Inc
as 2:2014cv00039
Plaintiff:
E2E Processing Inc
Defendant:
Nordstrom Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Eclipse IP LLC v. Nordstrom Inc
as 2:2013cv00358
Plaintiff:
Eclipse IP LLC
Defendant:
Nordstrom Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
MacroSolve, Inc. v. Nordstrom, Inc. et al
as 6:2013cv00204
Plaintiff:
MacroSolve, Inc.
Defendant:
Nordstrom, Inc. and HauteLook, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Lodsys Group, LLC v. B & H Foto & Electronics Corp. et al
as 2:2012cv00730
Plaintiff:
Lodsys Group, LLC
Defendant:
Charter Communications, Inc. , Lamps Plus, Inc. and Nordstrom, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Droplets, Inc. v. Nordstrom, Inc.
as 2:2012cv00390
Plaintiff:
Droplets, Inc.
Defendant:
Nordstrom, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Patton et al v. Nordstrom Inc
as 3:2012cv01920
Defendant:
Nordstrom Inc
Plaintiff:
Erica Patton and Deshee Malone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Soverain Software LLC v. Nordstrom, Inc.
as 6:2012cv00148
Plaintiff:
Soverain Software LLC
Defendant:
Nordstrom, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
