Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Picado Ocampo v. Armas et al
as 1:2026cv25013
Plaintiff:
Yury Jose Picado Ocampo
Defendant:
Marcus Bach Armas, Temur Adrianov, A. Pierre Louis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv25005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv25031
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. BMW of Cincinnati North
as 1:2026cv00724
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jones
Defendant:
BMW of Cincinnati North
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
North Smithfield School Department v. M.A. on behalf of P.T.X
as 1:2026cv00498
Appellant:
North Smithfield School Department
Appellee:
M.A. on behalf of P.T.X
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
HQS Automotive International Inc. v. Seoyon North America, S. de R.L. de C.V.
as 1:2026cv02061
Plaintiff:
HQS Automotive International Inc.
Defendant:
Seoyon North America, S. de R.L. de C.V.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv25039
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv24995
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv25030
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Morris v. Life Insurance Company of America North America
as 0:2026cv62035
Plaintiff:
Brian Morris
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of America North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
