Cases 1 - 10 of 17
MANLEY v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY JAIL
as 5:2023cv03958
Plaintiff:
GARY MANLEY
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlos Montes-Vasquez v. Northampton County Jail, et al
as 22-2246
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLOS A. MONTES-VASQUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY JAIL and MEDICAL STAFF NORTHAMPTON COUNTY JAIL
MONTES-VASQUEZ v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY JAIL et al
as 5:2022cv01707
Plaintiff:
CARLOS A. MONTES-VASQUEZ
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY JAIL and MEDICAL STAFF OF NORTHAMPTON COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FERRETTI v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY JAIL et al
as 5:2021cv03530
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ROBERT FERRETTI
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY JAIL, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, NORTHAMPTON POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matos-Ramirez v. Northampton County Jail et al
as 5:2021cv02976
Plaintiff:
Genesis Matos-Ramirez
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY JAIL and St. Luke's Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matos-Ramirez v. Northampton County Jail et al
as 1:2021cv01026
Defendant:
St. Luke's Hospital and Northampton County Jail
Plaintiff:
Genesis Matos-Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castner v. Northampton County Jail et al
as 1:2020cv02131
Petitioner:
Philip Castner
Respondent:
Warden of Northampton County Jail and Pennsylvania Attorney General Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SNYDER v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY JAIL
as 5:2020cv03685
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY JAIL
Plaintiff:
XAVIER SNYDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOK v. SANTOS et al
as 5:2019cv01976
Defendant:
DAVID PENCHISHEN, SHARON GARRETSON, SANTOS and others
Plaintiff:
MAURICE JAMAL COOK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FENNELL v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2019cv01972
Defendant:
DAVID COLLINS, C.O. BAKER, C.O. CROWLEY and others
Plaintiff:
JAMARCUS FENNELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
