Cases 71 - 80 of 122
GIBSON v. COBURN et al
as 2:2015cv04335
Plaintiff:
STEVEN GIBSON
Defendant:
D. COBURN, K. JONES, RAMIREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIBSON v. COBURN et al
as 1:2015cv04335
Plaintiff:
STEVEN GIBSON
Defendant:
D. COBURN, K. JONES, RAMIREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOOSIER v. NORTHERN STATE PRISON et al
as 1:2015cv03839
Petitioner:
RASHAN HOOSIER
Respondent:
NORTHERN STATE PRISON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LOVE v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2015cv03681
Plaintiff:
LEMONT LOVE
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STEVEN JOHNSON, MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Thomas Clauso
as 15-2314
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: THOMAS JAMES CLAUSO
Defendant - Respondent:
WARDEN NORTHERN STATE PRISON and MR. SAPP, Sergeant, Assistant Warden
Nominal Respondent:
CLAIRE C. CECCHI
GIBSON v. COBURN et al
as 2:2015cv03026
Plaintiff:
STEVEN GIBSON
Defendant:
D COBURN, K JONES, RAMIREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodney Dutch v. Administrator Northern State P, et al
as 15-1855
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODNEY DUTCH
Defendant - Appellee:
ADMINISTRATOR NORTHERN STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
ORECKINTO v. NELSON et al
as 2:2015cv01316
Plaintiff:
ANDREW ORECKINTO
Defendant:
K. NELSON, D. HUNTER, NORTHERN STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRANT v. NORTHERN STATE PRISON
as 2:2014cv06597
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP GRANT
Defendant:
NORTHERN STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOVE v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2014cv05629
Plaintiff:
LEMONT LOVE
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , NORTHERN STATE PRISON , GARY LANIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
