Civil Rights Cases filed in Alabama
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Dixon v. Piedmont, Alabama, City of et al
as 1:2022cv00979
Plaintiff: Brittany Dixon and Britney Dixon
Defendant: Piedmont, Alabama, City of, Freddy Norton and Nathan Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harmon v. Alabama, State of et al
as 1:2021cv00947
Plaintiff: Jimmy Claude Harmon, Jr
Defendant: Alabama, State of, Calhoun County, Cleburne County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vares v. State of Alabama et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00148
Defendant: Timothy James Ritchie Trust, Benjamin Howard Albritton, C. Joseph Norton and others
Plaintiff: Christian Vares
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00078
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv01246
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Cunningham v. City of Piedmont et al
as 1:2018cv00669
Plaintiff: Javil Cunningham
Defendant: City of Piedmont , Piedmont Police Department , Robert Griffith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv02006
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01931
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00147
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Muhammad v. Muhammad et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00592
Plaintiff: Kalim A.R. Muhammad
Defendant: Brenda L. Bethel Muhammad, La Jenna Hatcher, William H. Steele and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?