Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Norton v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00763
Plaintiff:
Jaden David Norton
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith et al v. Decker et al
as 4:2022cv01396
Plaintiff:
Dana Elroy Smith and William Carl Matthews, Jr.
Defendant:
John D. Decker, Casey McClaine, Jessica Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Norton v. Bechtold
as 1:2022cv01299
Plaintiff:
Seth William Norton
Defendant:
William Bechtold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norton v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
as 1:2022cv00653
Petitioner:
Seth William Norton
Respondent:
Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norton v. Franklin County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv00418
Plaintiff:
Seth William Norton
Defendant:
Franklin County Jail and Primecare Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00362
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
O'Donnell et al v. Scranton School District et al
as 3:2020cv00225
Defendant:
Robert Lesh, Tom Schuster, Scranton School District and others
Plaintiff:
Albert P. O'Donnell, Rebecca M. O'Brien and George Gevaras
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norton v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 3:2019cv00624
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, U.S. Bank National Association, Bank of America Home Loans and others
Plaintiff:
William Norton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
NORTON v. CARAWAY
as 1:2015cv01690
Petitioner:
Darnell Norton
Respondent:
Superintendent, USP-Lewisburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
