Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Smith et al v. Decker et al
as 4:2022cv01396
Plaintiff:
Dana Elroy Smith and William Carl Matthews, Jr.
Defendant:
John D. Decker, Casey McClaine, Jessica Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00362
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
O'Donnell et al v. Scranton School District et al
as 3:2020cv00225
Defendant:
Robert Lesh, Tom Schuster, Scranton School District and others
Plaintiff:
Albert P. O'Donnell, Rebecca M. O'Brien and George Gevaras
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOLFGRAMM v. COMMUNICATION WORKERS OF AMERICA LOCAL 13301 et al
as 2:2019cv03701
Plaintiff:
ROSAMUND A. WOLFGRAMM
Defendant:
BETH NORTON, COMMUNICATION WORKERS OF AMERICA DISTRICT 2-13, DENNIS EICHFELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
CHANEY et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv04890
Plaintiff:
TREVOR CHANEY and PATRICE THIEDE
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CHARLES H. RAMSEY, CHRISTOPHER JOHNSTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
EDWARDS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv02023
Plaintiff:
JAY EDWARDS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ROB'S TOWING, EAMON MCWILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
K.D. v. G.T.N. et al
as 2:2012cv00939
Plaintiff:
K.D.
Defendant:
G.T.N., ANTHONY DEBERNARDO, HEIDI DEBERNARDO-NORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
