Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Clarke v. NPR
as 1:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
William Carol Clarke
Defendant:
NPR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv04608
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
American Express Bank, FSB v. Paritosh Mazumder et al
as 8:2018cv00099
Plaintiff:
American Express Bank, FSB
Defendant:
Does, Paritosh Mazumder and NPR Biomedical, Inc.
Cox vs. Randazza, et al.,
as 2:2013cv00297
Defendant:
AOL Inc., APPLE, David S. Aman, OR and others
Plaintiff:
Crystal L Cox
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Randazza et al v. Cox et al
as 2:2012cv02040
Counter Defendant:
David S. Aman, David S. Aman, Apple and others
Defendant:
Eliot Bernstein and Crystal L Cox
Cross Defendant:
Bernie Cassidy and Jessica Griffin Godaddy
Counter Claimant:
Crystal L Cox and Crystal L Cox
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Randazza, Marc J Randazza and Natalia Randazza
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
In Re: iPhone/iPad Application Consumer Privacy Litigation
as 5:2011md02250
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rodimer, Cole Parr, William Moylan and others
Defendant:
Apple, Inc., TrafficMarketplace.com. Inc., Yelp!, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rodimer et al v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 5:2011cv00700
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rodimer , Arfat Adil , Emili Clar and others
Defendant:
Apple, Inc. , Flurry, Inc. , Medialets, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lalo v. Apple, Inc et al
as 5:2010cv05878
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lalo , Dustin Freeman , Jared Parsley and others
Defendant:
Apple, Inc , Backflip , Dictionary.com and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ines Gonzales et al v. NPR Telecommunications, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv06244
Plaintiff:
Ines Gonzales, Ines Gonzales, Ines Gonzales and others
Defendant:
NPR Telecommunications, Inc. and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
