Cases 41 - 50 of 72
McDaniel v. United States of America et al
as 2:2015cv00937
Plaintiff:
Tanya McDaniel
Defendant:
United States of America, University of California, Davis, Linda P.B. Katehi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stor-Mor Of Cypress, L.P. v. GAK, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv01715
Defendant:
GAK, LLC, Andrie F. Grimaud, Michael R Marquardt and others
Plaintiff:
Stor-Mor Of Cypress, L.P.
Stor-Mor Of Cypress, L.P. v. GAK, LLC et al
as 8:2015cv00382
Defendant:
GAK, LLC, Andrie F. Grimaud, Michael R Marquardt and others
Counter Claimant:
Andrie F. Grimaud and Michael R Marquardt
Counter Defendant:
Stor-Mor Of Cypress, L.P.
Plaintiff:
Stor-Mor Of Cypress, L.P.
Barcus v. NSA
as 2:2014cv02125
Plaintiff:
Kody Logan Barcus
Defendant:
NSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brendon Micheal Jacobs v. NSA et al
as 2:2014cv04358
Institute Of Electronics Electrical Engineer:
IEEE
Plaintiff:
Brandon Michael Jacobs
National Security Agency:
NSA
Paul Ryan Barous v. NSA/CSS et al
as 8:2014cv00698
Plaintiff:
Paul Ryan Barous
Defendant:
Elizabeth R Brooks and NSA/CSS
Renjoir v. White House et al
as 2:2013cv01277
Plaintiff:
William Renjoir
Defendant:
White House, United States Secret Service, Donald Rumsfeld and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Calhoun v. San Diego, County of et al
as 3:2012cv02070
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego, County of, Huff , Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Calhoun v. San Diego County and All of Its Corrupt Parties et al
as 3:2012cv01945
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego County and All of Its Corrupt Parties, Irma E. Gonzales , Sabraw and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Calhoun v. San Diego, County of et al
as 3:2012cv00955
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego, County of, Edward J. Schwartz, Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
