Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Nagle v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv02849
Plaintiff:
John W. Nagle
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Foundation for Lost Boys and Girls of Sudan, Inc. et al v. Alcon Entertainment, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00509
Plaintiff:
Foundation for Lost Boys and Girls of Sudan, Inc. , Nathaniel Chol Nyok , Bol Deng Bol and others
Defendant:
Alcon Entertainment, LLC, Imagine Entertainment, LLC, Good Lie Productions LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
PITTS v. SPIVEY et al
as 1:2012cv00016
Plaintiff:
RANDALL PITTS
Defendant:
CARSON SPIVEY, CHRISTOPHER VANN, Jimmy Colson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Whaley v. Kuehne+Nagle, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02460
Plaintiff:
Nancy J. Whaley and Nancy J. Whaley
Defendant:
Kuehne+Nagle, Inc., Jeff Stuart and Chuck Arfsten
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 U.S. Services Employment/Reemployment Act of 1994
Type:
Other Statutes
Bridges v. Donald et al
as 1:2008cv00123
Plaintiff:
John Wayne Bridges
Defendant:
Warden Colson, Deputy Warden Nagle and Carmanelia Bryant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
