Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Castelaz et al v. The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05713
Plaintiff:
Celia Castelaz, Brittanie Nalley, Northa Johnson and others
Defendant:
The Estee Lauder Companies Inc., Bobbi Brown Professional Cosmetics, Inc., Estee Lauder Inc. and others
Meyer et al v. Raoul et al
as 3:2021cv00518
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYER, FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, INC., SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION and others
Defendant:
KWAME RAOUL, BRENDAN KELLY, DWIGHT A. BAIRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garces v. Gerber Products Co. et al
as 1:2021cv00719
Plaintiff:
Aileen Garces, Stacy Musto, Michelle Lyles and others
Defendant:
The Hain Celestial Group, Inc., Gerber Products Co., Nurture, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Minerly v. Nalley et al
as 3:2019cv00467
Defendant:
Officer Mezo, John R. Baldwin, Nick Nalley and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Minerly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farm Credit Leasing Services Corporation v. Nalley
as 3:2019cv00424
Plaintiff:
Farm Credit Leasing Services Corporation
Defendant:
Chad E. Nalley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Watson v. Dodd et al
as 3:2016cv01217
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Watson
Defendant:
C/O Dodd, C/O McBride, Lt Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Minerly v. Nalley et al
as 3:2016cv00782
Plaintiff:
Robert Minerly
Defendant:
Nick Nalley and Jason Garnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manuel v. Roeckeman et al
as 3:2015cv00783
Plaintiff:
Elijah Manuel
Defendant:
C/O Nalley and Cindy Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cullum et al v. Davis et al
as 3:2015cv00631
Plaintiff:
Detrick Cullum and Alphonso Adams
Defendant:
C/O Davis, Nalley, Louis Browder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross v. Gossett et al
as 3:2015cv00309
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Ross
Defendant:
Greg Gossett, Zach Roeckeman, Stephen Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
