Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Zeller v. Skaggs et al
as 3:2023cv03288
Plaintiff: Vallie Francis Zeller
Defendant: Ethan Skaggs, Jordan Campanella, Todd Shultz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zeller v. Skaggs et al
as 2:2023cv02191
Plaintiff: Vallie Francis Zeller
Defendant: Ethan Skaggs, Jordan Campanella, Todd Shultz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sacorey Clark v. Nancy Rosenstengel
as 20-1788
Petitioner: SACOREY CLARK
Respondent: NANCY J. ROSENSTENGEL
Adebisi Adigun v. Nancy Rosenstengel
as 19-1392
Respondent: NANCY J. ROSENSTENGEL
Petitioner: ADEBISI T. ADIGUN
Kenneth Thomas v. Nancy Rosenstengel
as 18-2265
Petitioner: KENNETH V. THOMAS
Respondent: NANCY J. ROSENSTENGEL
Party-in-Interest: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Katsuyama Kikai, Ltd., et al v. Nancy J. Rosenstengel
as 17-1389
Petitioner: KATSUYAMA KIKAI, LTD. and NITCHI COMPANY, LTD.
Respondent: NANCY J. ROSENSTENGEL
Party-in-Interest: TIMOTHY SAGEZ, as representative of the Estate of Jason Sagez, and individually as next of kin
Scott Peters v. Donald Wilkerson, et al
as 17-1068
Petitioner: SCOTT PETERS
Respondent: DONALD G. WILKERSON, Magistrate Judge and NANCY J. ROSENSTENGEL, District Judge
Party-in-Interest: KIM BUTLER, Warden, JOHN TROST, Doctor, JOHN R. BALDWIN, IDOC Director in his official capacity only and others
Box v. Rosenstengel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2015cv01273
Plaintiff: Keith Box
Defendant: Nancy J Rosenstengel, Michael Jordan, Michael J Reagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Box v. Rosenstengel et al
as 3:2015cv03232
Plaintiff: Keith Box
Defendant: Nancy J Rosenstengel, Michael Jordan, Michael J Reagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronnie Lauderdale v. Nancy Rosenstengel
as 15-2645
Petitioner: RONNIE LAUDERDALE
Respondent: NANCY J. ROSENSTENGEL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?