Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Maione v. Zucker
as 22-782
Plaintiff / Appellant: Scott Maione and Tasha Ostler
Defendant / Appellee: Dr. Howard A. Zucker, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health, Samuel D. Roberts, Commissioner of the New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, Darlene Oto, Principal Hearing Officer, Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance and others
Defendant: Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, Office of Administrative Hearings, Nirav Shah, Former Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health, Kirsten M. Proud, Former Commissioner of the New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance and others
Not Classified By Court: Department of Justice
Murphy v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00516
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Nancy Murphy and Nancy J. Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Maione v. Zucker
as 20-3658
Defendant: Flo Mercer, Office of Administrative Hearings (OTDA), Compliance Coordinator, Adrienne Alcaro, Former Rockland Medicaid Director, Nirav Shah, Former Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Tasha Ostler and Scott Maione
Defendant / Appellee: Joan Silvestri, Commissioner, Rockland County, Department of Social Services, Dr. Howard A. Zucker, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health, Darlene Oto, Principal Hearing Officer, Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance and others
Maione et al v. Zucker et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv07452
Plaintiff: Scott Maione and Tasha Ostler
Defendant: Howard A. Zucker, Nira V Shah, Samuel D. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maione et al v. Zucker et al
as 7:2018cv07452
Defendant: Joan Silvestri, Dr. Howard A. Zucker, Kristen M. Proud and others
Plaintiff: Scott Maione and Tasha Ostler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Murphy et al v. Snyder et al
as 3:2018cv01183
Defendant: Stuart Snyder, Greenwich Development Group, LLC, Doreen Snyder and others
Plaintiff: Joseph Murphy and Nancy Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-1578
Debtor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Murphy et al v. Snyder et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014mc00135
Plaintiff: Joseph J. Murphy and Nancy Murphy
Defendant: Stuart Snyder, Doreen Snyder, BBSEA Associates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
In Re: World Trade Center Disa
as 12-3254
Plaintiff: Marion S. Mishkin Law Office, of counsel Noice of appearance to Sacks & Sacks, Kathleen Carty, Yajaira Strohl and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Tier 4 Plaintiffs
Appellant: WTC Captive Insurance Company, Inc.
Defendant: City of New York, AMEC Construction Management, Inc., Bovis Lend Lease LMB, Inc. and others
Cross Appellant: Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern, LLP
Defendant / Appellant: Berkel & Company, Contractors, Inc., Diamond Point Excavating Corp., E. J. Davies, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae: United States District Court Eastern District of New York
In Re: World Trade Center Disa
as 12-3254
Plaintiff: Marion S. Mishkin, of counsel Noice of appearance to Sacks & Sacks, Kathleen Carty, Yajaira Strohl and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: Tier 4 Plaintiffs
Appellant: WTC Captive Insurance Company, Inc.
Defendant: City of New York, AMEC Construction Management, Inc., Bovis Lend Lease LMB, Incorporated and others
Cross-Appellant: Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern, LLP and Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo P.C.
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee: AMEC Construction Management, Incorporated, AMEC Earth & Environmental, Incorporated, Evergreen Recycling of Corona and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?