Cases 1 - 10 of 19
CPAVC, Inc. v. Sancus-Trinity Nano Holdings, LLC
as 1:2023cv07742
Plaintiff:
CPAVC, Inc. and CPAV, INC.
Defendant:
SANCUS-TRINITY NANO HOLDINGS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Garcia v. C And D Northfield LLC et al
as 1:2021cv06071
Plaintiff:
Zosimo Mendiola Garcia
Defendant:
C And D Northfield LLC, Taco Nano LLC, The Good Plate Hospitality Group, LLC and others
Roe v. Nano Gas Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2020cv07269
Defendant:
Nano Gas Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cliffton Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Apollo Petroleum Solutions, LLC v. Nano Gas Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2020cv02311
Defendant:
Nano Gas Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Apollo Petroleum Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Taplin, Jr. v. Watson et al
as 3:2019cv01123
Defendant:
J. Loche, Price, Counselor Inbaden and others
Plaintiff:
Enos F. Taplin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roe v. Nano Gas Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2018cv06757
Defendant:
Nano Gas Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cliffton Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roe v. Nano Gas Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2017cv02241
Plaintiff:
Clifton Roe
Defendant:
Nano Gas Technologies, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Nano Gas Technologies, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Nano Gas Technologies, Inc. and Clifton Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nano Gas Technologies, Inc. v. Roe
as 1:2017cv01738
Plaintiff:
Nano Gas Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Clifton Roe
Counter_claimant:
Clifton Roe
Counter_defendant:
Nano Gas Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Tolbert v. Alessi et al
as 1:2016cv10013
Plaintiff:
George Tolbert
Defendant:
Christine Alessi, Nano Guardi and James Gillespie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv07739
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
