Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Richardson v. Jackson et al
as 1:2018cv04738
Plaintiff:
Paul Richardson
Defendant:
Theodore "Ted" Jackson, P.A. Zanebee, Nurse Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheerer v. Moody et al
as 1:2018cv03267
Defendant:
Naphcare Medical, Officer Reed, Officer Graham and others
Plaintiff:
Dominick Francis Sheerer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tramel v. Newton County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2015cv04474
Plaintiff:
Melanie Chambliss Tramel
Defendant:
Newton County Sheriff's Office , Ezell Brown , NaphCare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Durden v. Newton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2014cv01163
Plaintiff:
Latish Durden
Defendant:
Newton County, Georgia , Ezell Brown , Newton County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Amato v. Brown et al
as 1:2011cv01879
Plaintiff:
Frank Charles Amato
Defendant:
Ezell Brown, Sammy Banks, Salina Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stowe v. Newton County et al
as 1:2011cv00916
Plaintiff:
Darrell Anthony Stowe
Defendant:
Newton County, Ozburn, Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stowe v. Newton County et al
as 3:2011cv00020
Plaintiff:
Darrell Anthony Stowe
Defendant:
Newton County, Ozburn, Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sawyer v. Brown et al
as 1:2009cv03556
Plaintiff:
Tommy Rufus Sawyer, Jr.
Defendant:
Ezell Brown, Naphcare and Thomas McElligott, Dr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Other Statutes
Campbell v. Naphcare
as 1:2008cv03273
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Campbell
Defendant:
Naphcare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baynes v. NAPHCARE Health Care, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00541
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L. Baynes
Defendant:
NAPHCARE Health Care, Inc., Terri Noel, Lisa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
