Cases 31 - 40 of 93
Crow et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv04817
Plaintiff:
Natalie Crow and Michael Crow
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv04451
Plaintiff:
Natalie Anderson and Donald Anderson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2014cv29700
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Mary Nell Evans , Lucinda Theobald , Linda Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hodgkinson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv28869
Plaintiff:
Natalie Hodgkinson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv28883
Plaintiff:
Natalie Jo Jackson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. The State of West Virginia et al
as 2:2014cv27456
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
The State of West Virginia and Natalie E. Tennant
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 20301
Kobata et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv25368
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Kobata , Ingeborg Sautter , Emma Smith and others
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Sofradim Production SAS, Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kennedy v. Ethicon, Inc. et al.
as 2:2014cv22765
Plaintiff:
Natalie K. Kennedy
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Renner v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv21154
Plaintiff:
Natalie Renner
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hinton et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv19176
Plaintiff:
Natalie Hinton and David Hinton, Sr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
