Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Clervrain et al v. Griffin et al
as 1:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Ashly Carmelle Dorsainville, Fridelyne Maisoneuve and others
Defendant:
Antwaun Griffin, Isabella Casillas Guzman, Diedra Henry-Spires and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00327
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Munoz v. A Wheels, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00324
Defendant:
A Wheels, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Natalie Munoz
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Casci et al v. PHH Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv00527
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Casci and Natalie A. Casci
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Corporation and J.P. Morgan Alternative Loan Trust 2006-S4, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lopez v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals
as 1:2016cv00133
Plaintiff:
Natalys E Lopez
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perry et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00641
Plaintiff:
Niveira Perry , Lori A. Perry and Natalie Cabral
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and The Bank Of New York Mellon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spearman v. Travis & Natalie, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00522
Plaintiff:
Joshua Spearman
Defendant:
Travis & Natalie, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
