Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Louis Gonzales v. TDCJ, et al
as 20-20369
Defendant / Appellee:
HUNSTVILLE UNIT, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, WARDEN, at the Huntsville Unit, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS GONZALES
Gonzales v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2020cv01338
Defendant:
Warden, Lorie Davis, Nathan Quarterman and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzales v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 3:2020cv00666
Defendant:
Warden, Nathan Quarterman, Byrd Unit and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Hopson v. TDCJ-CID, et al
as 10-41001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES A. HOPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, NATHAN QUARTERMAN, JOHN RUPERT and others
Butler v. Barker et al
as 6:2009cv00507
Plaintiff:
Michael D Butler
Defendant:
Rhonda A Barker, Chuck I Biscoe, Robert D Hererra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reece v. Owens et al
as 5:2009cv00144
Plaintiff:
Reginald Reece
Defendant:
Rissie Owens, Brad Livingston, Nathan Quarterman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newman v. Quarterman et al
as 4:2009cv02024
Plaintiff:
Ernest Dale Newman
Defendant:
Nathan Quarterman, Kevin Mafield, A. Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broussard v. Quarterman
as 4:2009cv01535
Petitioner:
Morris R Broussard
Respondent:
Nathan Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
French v. Quarterman
as 9:2009cv00074
Plaintiff:
Ronald French
Defendant:
Nathaneal Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holmes v. Quarterman
as 4:2009cv01241
Petitioner:
Billy Holmes
Respondent:
Nathan Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
