Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Barton v. Walmart Inc., et al.
as 24-2649
Plaintiff:
NATHEN W. BARTON
Defendant:
WALMART INC., JOHN DOE, 1-10 and SHOUJING ZHOU
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Barton v. Real Innovation Inc et al
as 3:2024cv05194
Plaintiff:
Nathen W Barton
Defendant:
Real Innovation Inc, Richardson Marketing Group LLC, Deryck D Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Barton v. Pinnacle Home Improvements LLC et al
as 3:2024cv05142
Plaintiff:
Nathen W Barton
Defendant:
Pinnacle Home Improvements, LLC and John Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Barton v. Alleviate Tax LLC et al
as 3:2023cv06071
Plaintiff:
Nathen W Barton
Defendant:
Alleviate Tax LLC and John Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Barton v. The Rian Group Inc et al
as 3:2023cv05452
Plaintiff:
Nathen W Barton
Defendant:
The Rian Group, Inc. and Aaron Rian
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Barton v. Walmart Inc et al
as 3:2023cv05063
Plaintiff:
Nathen W Barton
Defendant:
Walmart Inc. and John and Jane Doe(s) 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Barton v. Cascade Pacific Counsel
as 3:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
Nathen Barton and Nathen W Barton
Defendant:
Cascade Pacific Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Barton v. Digital Thrive LLC et al
as 3:2023cv05005
Plaintiff:
Nathen W Barton
Defendant:
Digital Thrive LLC, Jennifer Mansfield and Paul Mansfield
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
