Cases 11 - 20 of 91
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv00109
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
First National Bank of Omaha v. Krause
as 8:2018mc00005
Plaintiff:
First National Bank of Omaha
Defendant:
Cody James Krause
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Burns v. First National Bank of Omaha et al
as 8:2017cv00289
Plaintiff:
Kevin E. Burns
Defendant:
First National Bank of Omaha and Wright S. Walling
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
First National Bank of Omaha v. Henderson
as 8:2016mc00145
Plaintiff:
First National Bank of Omaha
Defendant:
Sasha LeeAnn Henderson
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
First National Bank of Omaha v. Le
as 4:2016mc03022
Plaintiff:
First National Bank of Omaha
Defendant:
Andy An Le
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
First National Bank of Omaha v. Wilke et al
as 8:2016mc00034
Plaintiff:
First National Bank of Omaha
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Defendant:
Ann Marie Wilke
Debtor:
Robert Wilke
Saldi et al v. American National Bank et al
as 8:2016cv00061
Defendant:
American National Bank, Rodney L. Laible, RD Family Limited Partnership and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Saldi, Debra Saldi and TBD Enterprises, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
First National Bank of Omaha v. Bures et al
as 4:2015mc03024
Defendant:
Sunny Chong Bures and U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Debtor:
William J. Bures
Plaintiff:
First National Bank of Omaha
First National Bank of Omaha v. Rathje et al
as 4:2015mc03022
Plaintiff:
First National Bank of Omaha
Debtor:
David A. Rathje
Defendant:
David A. Rathje
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
First National Bank of Omaha v. Gleason
as 8:2015mc00052
Plaintiff:
First National Bank of Omaha
Defendant:
Thomas Alan Gleason
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
