Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04651
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thomas Luczak v. FIZZ, et al
as 19-14081
Defendant / Appellee:
NICK A. CAPORELLA, NATIONAL BEVERAGE CORP. and GEORGE R. BRACKEN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS W. LUCZAK
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv07798
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv14532
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Willoughby v. Caporella et al
as 1:2018cv01739
Plaintiff:
Kamiya Willoughby
Defendant:
Joseph G. Caporella, Cecil D. Conlee, Samuel C. Hathorn, Jr. and others
Nominal Defendant:
National Beverage Corp.
Rice v. National Beverage Corporation d/b/a LaCroix Sparkling Waters
as 1:2018cv07151
Defendant:
National Beverage Corporation d/b/a LaCroix Sparkling Waters and National Beverage Corp.
Plaintiff:
Lenora Rice
Petitioner:
Givaudan Flavors Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LUCZAK v. NATIONAL BEVERAGE CORP. et al
as 0:2018cv61631
Defendant:
NATIONAL BEVERAGE CORP., GEORGE R. BRACKEN and NICK A. CAPORELLA
Plaintiff:
THOMAS W. LUCZAK
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Angus McDowell v. George Bracken, et al
as 18-12762
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANGUS MCDOWELL, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant National Beverage Corp.
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE R. BRACKEN, NICK A. CAPORELLA, JOSEPH G. CAPORELLA and others
McDowell v. Bracken et al
as 0:2017cv61535
Plaintiff:
Angus McDowell
Defendant:
George R. Bracken , Nick A. Caporella , Joseph G. Caporella and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
