Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Morales, et al., v. Sunpath Ltd., et al.,
as 2:2023mc00111
Plaintiff:
Kurt Morales II, Brandon Callier and Lucas Horton
Defendant:
Sunpath Ltd.
Respondent:
National Car Cure LLC
Rogers v. Sunpath Ltd et al
as 4:2022cv01051
Plaintiff:
Samuel Rogers
Defendant:
Sunpath Ltd and National Car Cure LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Seibels, III v. National Car Cure, LLC
as 2:2021cv03569
Plaintiff:
John P Seibels, III
Defendant:
National Car Cure, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Waltz v. National Car Cure, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv04326
Plaintiff:
Walter Waltz
Defendant:
National Car Cure, LLC and Pelican Investment Holdings Group, LLC doing business as AAP
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Thuo v. National Car Cure LLC et al
as 3:2021cv01201
Defendant:
National Car Cure, LLC, Matrix Financial Services, LLC, SING for Services, LLC doing business as MEPCO and others
Plaintiff:
Hanna Thuo
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Poston v. National Car Cure, LLC
as 4:2021cv00416
Plaintiff:
Kellye Poston
Defendant:
National Car Cure, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Kaufman v. National Car Cure LLC et al
as 0:2021cv60389
Defendant:
National Car Cure LLC and Gustav Renny
Plaintiff:
Joshua Philip Kaufman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Rowan v. Affordable Car Cure, Inc. et al
as 9:2020cv82168
Defendant:
SunPath LTD, Affordable Car Cure, Inc., Gustav Renny and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Rowan
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Timmerman v. National Car Cure, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00590
Defendant:
National Car Cure, LLC, SunPath Funding, LLC and SunPath LTD
Plaintiff:
Adam Timmerman
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Callier v. SunPath LTD et al
as 3:2020cv00106
Defendant:
National Car Cure LLC, SunPath LTD, Northcoast Warranty Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Callier
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
