Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Nat'l Fed v. City of Arlington
as 23-10034
Plaintiff / Appellee:
National Federation of the Blind of Texas, Incorporated, a Texas nonprofit corporation and Arms of Hope, nonprofit corporations,
Defendant / Appellant:
City of Arlington, Texas, a municipal corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
National Federation of the Blind of Texas Inc v. City of Arlington Texas
as 3:2021cv02028
Plaintiff:
National Federation of the Blind of Texas, Inc., a Texas nonprofit corporation and National Federation of the Blind of Texas Inc
Defendant:
City of Arlington, Texas, a municipal corporation and City of Arlington Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans with Disabilities Act
Natl Federation of the Blind, et al v. Greg Abbott
as 10-10236
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND OF TEXAS INC., a Texas Nonprofit Corporation and INSTITUTE FOR DISABILITY ACCESS INC., also known as Adapt of Texas Inc.
Defendant - Appellant:
GREG ABBOTT, as he is Attorney General of the State of Texas
National Federation of the Blind of Texas Inc et al v. Abbott
as 3:2009cv01567
Plaintiff:
National Federation of the Blind of Texas, Inc. and Institute for Disability Access, Inc
Defendant:
Greg Abbott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
