Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 633
Huber v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv09348
Plaintiff:
Amy B. Huber
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Daryl M. Evans and John Doe 1 through John Doe 5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clements v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv06662
Plaintiff:
John Clements
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Daryl Evans and John/Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv04199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Woodruff v. National Railroad Passenger Co
as 10-325
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eric Woodruff
Defendant - Appellee:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Ebron v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 1:2008cv05998
Plaintiff:
Lorraine Ebron
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00906
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bottorff v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 6:2007cv00525
Plaintiff:
Chet Allen Bottorff
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Unknown person(s), Unknown person(s) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
