Cases 1 - 9 of 9
CLEMONS v. COHEN et al
as 2:2021cv03324
Plaintiff:
CHAFARRAH CLEMONS
Defendant:
ALAN COHEN, DANIEL MORONEY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CATERBONE et al v. THE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, NSA
as 5:2018cv04222
Plaintiff:
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, LTD. and STANLEY J. CATERBONE
Defendant:
THE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, NSA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
CATERBONE v. NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY et al
as 5:2017cv00867
Plaintiff:
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
Defendant:
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECT AGENCY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Caterbone v. National Security Agency et al
as 1:2016cv02513
Plaintiff:
Stanley J. Caterbone
Defendant:
National Security Agency, Defense Advanced Research Project Agency, Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CATERBONE v. OBAMA et al
as 5:2016cv04641
Plaintiff:
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
Defendant:
BARRACK OBAMA, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECT AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caterbone v. Obama et al
as 1:2016cv01751
Plaintiff:
Stanley J. Caterbone
Defendant:
Barrack Obama, National Security Agency, Defense Advanced Research Project Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. DICTORATE et al
as 2:2013cv01712
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
DICTORATE, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, BEHAVIORAL PSYCHOTHERAPY CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Dictorate et al
as 4:2013cv02599
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Dictorate, Central Intellegence Agency, Behavorial Psychotherapy Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEATHERMAN v. OBAMA et al
as 2:2012cv01486
Plaintiff:
NAOMI LEATHERMAN
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, QUEST DIAGNOSTICS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
