Cases 41 - 50 of 309
O'Dell v. TherapeuticsMD, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05001
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
TherapeuticsMD, Inc., Tommy G. Thompson, Hugh O'Dowd and others
Plotkin et al v. The Procter & Gamble Company, et al
as 3:2022cv00579
Plaintiff:
Faith Plotkin and Patrick Naughton
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company, Procter & Gamble Distributing LLC and The Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
PLOTKIN et al v. THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, et al
as 2:2022cv01481
Plaintiff:
FAITH PLOTKIN and PATRICK NAUGHTON
Defendant:
THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, PROCTER & GAMBLE DISTRIBUTING LLC and THE PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hermanson v. Minev et al
as 3:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
James Eugene Hermanson
Defendant:
Michael Minev, John Keast and Naughton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vebeliunas et al v. Naughton
as 1:2022cv02590
Plaintiff:
Linas Vebeliunas, Faustina Vebeliunas and Faustina Sinkuniene
Defendant:
Michael Naughton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Johnston v. Naughton
as 3:2022cv00083
Plaintiff:
Richard Johnston
Defendant:
Martin Naughton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnston v. Naughton
as 3:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
Richard Johnston
Defendant:
Dr. Martin Naughton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkes v. Childers et al
as 3:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
Kareem Wilkes
Defendant:
Ms. Childers, Conlin, Dr. Naughton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ware v. Sullivan et al
as 3:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Erin Ware
Defendant:
M. Sullivan, D. Richard, M Minev and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Naughton
as 3:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
William Williams
Defendant:
Martin Naughton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
