Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Scott v. Forgey et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00113
Plaintiff: Gary Lynn Scott, Jr.
Defendant: Alexander Forgey, Jim Hammond and Mashall Neal Pinkston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bongo Productions, LLC et al v. Lawrence et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00490
Plaintiff: Sanctuary Performing Arts LLC, Bongo Productions, LLC, Kaye Sayers and others
Defendant: Carter Lawrence, Neal Pinkston, Glenn R. Funk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lookout Mountain Suites, LLC v. Neal Pinkston, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-5324
Defendant / Appellee: SERGEANT KENDON MASSENGALE, #631, Chattanooga Police Department, in his individual capacity, NEAL PINKSTON, District Attorney General for 11th Judicial District of Tennessee, in his individual capacity, CITY OF CHATTANOOGA, TN, a Tennessee Municipality and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: LOOKOUT MOUNTAIN SUITES, LLC, as owner with right, title and interest on and before February 14, 2018, to certain real property described as 5505 Brainerd Road, Chattanooga, Tennessee 37411
Univ Life Church Monastery, et al v. Wayne Nabors, et al
as 21-5100
Plaintiff / Appellee: GABRIEL BISER, an individual, UNIVERSAL LIFE CHURCH MONASTERY STOREHOUSE, a Washington non-profit corporation and ERIN PATTERSON, an individual
Defendant / Appellant: WILLIAM F. KNOWLES, in his official capacity as County Clerk of Hamilton County, TN, HERBERT H. SLATERY, III, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Tennessee, NEAL PINKSTON, in his official capacity as District Attorney General for Hamilton County, TN and others
Defendant / Appellee: BILL LEE, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Tennessee
Univ Life Church Monastery, et al v. Wayne Nabors, et al
as 21-5048
Defendant: WAYNE NABORS, in his official capacity as County Clerk of Putnam County, TN
Defendant / Appellant: HERBERT H. SLATERY, III, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Tennessee, JENNINGS H. JONES, in his official capacity as District Attorney General for Rutherford County, TN, KIM R. HELPER, in her official capacity as District Attorney General for Rutherford County, TN and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: TIMEAKA FARRIS, a married couple, JAMES WELCH, an individual, ERIN PATTERSON, an individual and others
Charles Elsea, Jr. v. Neal Pinkston, et al
as 20-5982
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHARLES W. ELSEA, JR.
Defendant / Appellee: HAMILTON COUNTY, TN SHERIFF, DOCTOR KING, Hamilton County, TN Medical Examiner, HAMILTON COUNTY, TN and others
Henderson v. Sell et al
as 1:2020cv00139
Defendant: Neal Pinkston, Chattanooga, TN Housing Authority, Andrew Basler and others
Plaintiff: Ernest Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Univ Life Church Monastery, et al v. Wayne Nabors, et al
as 19-6217
Defendant / Appellant: NEAL PINKSTON, in his official capacity as District Attorney General for Hamilton County, HERBERT H. SLATERY, III, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Tennessee, BILL LEE, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Tennessee and others
Defendant: WAYNE NABORS
Plaintiff / Appellee: GALE PLUMM, a married couple, TIMEAKA FARRIS, a married couple, JAMES WELCH, an individual and others
Universal Life Church Monastery Storehouse et al v. Nabors et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00049
Plaintiff: Erin Patterson, Gabriel Biser, Universal Life Church Monastery Storehouse and others
Defendant: Wayne Nabors, Lisa Duke Crowell, William K. Knowles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lookout Mountain Suites, LLC v. Neal Pinkston, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00311
Defendant: Neal Pinkston, Sgt. Kendon Massengale, City of Chattanooga, Tennessee and others
Plaintiff: Lookout Mountain Suites, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?