Cases 1 - 8 of 8
David Jacob v. Rosalyn Cotton, et al
as 23-1023
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David H. Jacob
Defendant / Appellee:
Rosalyn Cotton, Chairperson, Nebraska Board of Parole, Mark T. Langan, Member, Nebraska Board of Parole, Robert Twiss, Member, Nebraska Board of Parole and others
David Jacob v. Rosalyn Cotton, et al
as 17-3469
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David H. Jacob
Defendant - Appellee:
Rosalyn Cotton, Chairperson of the Nebraska Board of Parole, Rex Richard, Member of the Nebraska Board of Parole, Randall L. Rehmeier, Member of the Nebraska Board of Parole and others
Sabata et al v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services et al
as 4:2017cv03107
Plaintiff:
Dylan Cardeilhac, James Curtright, Jason Galle and others
Defendant:
Harbans Deol, Does, Scott Frakes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nathaniel Deckard, Jr. v. Nebraska Board of Parole
as 10-2366
Petitioner - Appellant:
Nathaniel Deckard, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
Nebraska Board of Parole
Langa v. Houston et al
as 8:2010cv00229
Respondent:
Robert P. Houston, Nebraska Board of Pardons and Nebraska Board of Parole
Petitioner:
Wopashitwe Mondo Eyen We Langa
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edward Poindexter v. Robert Houston
as 10-1897
Petitioner:
Edward R. Poindexter
Respondent:
Robert Houston, Director of Nebraska Department of Correcional Services & Nebraska Board of Parole
Deckard v. Nebraska Board of Parole
as 8:2009cv00348
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Deckard, Jr.
Respondent:
Nebraska Board of Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hansen et al v. Nebraska Board of Parole et al
as 4:2007cv03086
Plaintiff:
Jerry L. Hansen and Steven M. Jacob
Respondent:
Nebraska Board of Parole and Esther Casmer
Defendant:
Sam Shaw, Dennis Bakewell, Frank Hopkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
