Cases 1 - 10 of 16
JOSE et al v. PARIS et al
as 2:2023cv03159
Plaintiff:
SHYLAJA JOSE and JOSE THARAKAN
Defendant:
JUAN PARIS and NEBRASKALAND, INC. d/b/a NEBRASKALAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ARAYA et al v. NEBRASKALAND, INC. et al
as 3:2022cv02581
Plaintiff:
WALTER ARAYA and MARIA BARRANTES
Cross Claimant:
NEBRASKALAND, INC. and MANUEL JUSTINIANO
Cross Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10 and XYZ CORPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice for Removal- Personal Injury
Walsh, Jr. v. Nebraskaland, Inc.
as 1:2021cv03633
Respondent:
Nebraskaland, Inc.
Petitioner:
John J. Walsh, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160 j
Karim v. Nebraskaland, Inc.
as 1:2015cv04079
Plaintiff:
Ahamad Karim
Defendant:
Nebraskaland, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Palummo v. Nebraskaland, Inc.
as 1:2014cv05384
Plaintiff:
Gino Palummo
Defendant:
Nebraskaland, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NEBRASKALAND, INC. v. RIVER STREET IDEALEASE, LLC
as 2:2013cv01270
Plaintiff:
NEBRASKALAND, INC.
Defendant:
RIVER STREET IDEALEASE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv07345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Equal Rights Under the Law
NETWORK COMMODITIES, LLC. et al v. GOLONDRINAS TRADING CO., LTD. et al
as 1:2011cv03119
Plaintiff:
NETWORK COMMODITIES, LLC. and NEBRASKALAND, INC.
Defendant:
GOLONDRINAS TRADING CO., LTD. , DAMIAN MIRIELLO and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kane et al v. Nebraskaland, Inc.
as 1:2011cv01704
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kane, Jr. , Oscar Gonzales , Charles Machadio and others
Defendant:
Nebraskaland, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
