Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Henry v. County of Niagara
as 14-3089
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
Beverly Henry and Thaddeus Rogier
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Deputy Sheriff Ray Tracy, Deputy Sheriff C. S. Page, John Does, I-XV whose identities are unknown, except to the extent that they are employees of the County of Niagara, and/or members or personnel of the Niagara County Sheriff's Department and others
Smulley v. Mutual of Omaha Bank et al
as 3:2014cv00997
Plaintiff:
Dorothy A. Smulley
Defendant:
Mutual of Omaha Bank, Erin Bowen, Erin Alicata and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Smulley v. Mutual of Omaha Bank et al
as 3:2014cv00453
Plaintiff:
Dorothy A. Smulley
Defendant:
Mutual of Omaha Bank, Erin Bowen, Webster Financial Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al v. Ellina Matskina, L.Ac. et al
as 1:2014cv01330
Defendant:
Acuhealth Acupuncture, PC, Acupuncture Approach, PC, Ada Kulagina, L.Ac. and others
Plaintiff:
American Economy Insurance Company, American Fire and Casualty Company, American States Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. Razzakova et al
as 1:2011cv03247
Defendant:
Ilona Abitbol, Acuhealth Acupuncture, PC, Acupuncture Approach, PC and others
Plaintiff:
Geico Casualty Co., Geico General Insurance Company, Geico Indemnity Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lachira et al v. Sutton et al
as 3:2007cv01850
Plaintiff:
Minerva Lachira and Sean Andrew Pyle
Defendant:
Stanford H. Sutton, Guy S. Sutton, James J. Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lachira et al v. Sutton et al
as 3:2007mc00342
Plaintiff:
Minerva Lachira and Sean Andrew Pyle
Defendant:
Stanford H. Sutton, Guy S. Sutton, James J. Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
