Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Lucius et al v Naphcare Inc.
as 1:2024cv01242
Plaintiff:
Estate of Alizon Lopez and SHAWN LUCIUS
Defendant:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONES OF COUNTY OF MESA, COLORADO, Todd Rowell, Craig Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 198
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Roybal v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01094
Plaintiff:
Greg Roybal
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Aiste Chamblin, Chirag Acharya and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Neil v. Lone Tree Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv01155
Plaintiff:
Brian David Neil
Defendant:
Lone Tree Police Department, John Hastings, Travis Sneith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Higley v. State of Utah, et al
as 23-4033
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK LEE HIGLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF UTAH, SPENCER COX, Governor, TOOELE COUNTY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00716
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Truong v. Stitt, et al
as 22-6144
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAC TRUONG
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN STITT, GREG MCCORTNEY, CHARLES MCCALL and others
Truong et al v. Stitt et al
as 5:2022cv00491
Plaintiff:
Mac Truong, NARAL Pro-Choice America, Kevin McCarthy and others
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Greg McCortney, Charles McCall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Higley v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2022cv00289
Plaintiff:
Mark Lee Higley
Defendant:
State of Utah, Spencer Cox, Tooele County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
