Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Eliot Holdings et al v. Faps Holdings et al
as 2:2012cv00860
Plaintiff:
Eliot Holdings , Ron E. Dichter , John W. Howe and others
Defendant:
Faps Holdings , Neil L. Randel and Debra Bradford
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Goode v. One West Bank et al
as 2:2012cv00815
Plaintiff:
Robert Neil Goode
Defendant:
One West Bank , Indy Mac Mortgage Services and Etitle Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hayes et al v. Chevron Pipe Line Company
as 2:2012cv00287
Plaintiff:
Peter Hayes , Thi-Ly Downing-Hays , George Eugene Barton and others
Defendant:
Chevron Pipe Line Company and PacifiCorp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lewis v. Wilcox
as 2:2011cv01125
Plaintiff:
Neil D. Lewis
Defendant:
FNU Wilcox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webb v. Weber County Government et al
as 1:2011cv00128
Plaintiff:
David Webb
Defendant:
Weber County Government, Craig L. Dearden, Jan M. Zogmaister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of James D. Redd, M.D. v. Love et al
as 2:2011cv00478
Plaintiff:
Estate of James D. Redd, M.D.
Defendant:
Daniel Love, Dan Barnes, Brent Range and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Schmitt v. Stearns Lending et al
as 2:2011cv00381
Plaintiff:
Neil M. Schmitt
Defendant:
Stearns Lending , Citimortgage , National City Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gardner v. Ogden City et al
as 1:2011cv00031
Plaintiff:
Robert Gardner
Defendant:
Ogden City , Matthew Godfrey , Bart Blair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fitzone Nation v. Anderson et al
as 1:2010cv00130
Plaintiff:
Fitzone Nation
Defendant:
Neil Kent Anderson, Elizabeth Miller Bennett, Megan Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Weikert v. Utah Department of Corrections
as 2:2010cv00512
Petitioner:
Robert Neil Weikert
Respondent:
Utah Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
