Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv07999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Presley v. Neiman Marcus
as 1:2026cv02009
Plaintiff:
Wendy Marie Ann Presley
Defendant:
Neiman Marcus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Abair v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Riverside
as 26-4005
Petitioner:
RYAN ABAIR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE
Real Party In Interest:
NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP, LLC
Ryan Abair v. Neiman Marcus
as 5:2026cv02250
Plaintiff:
Ryan Abair
Defendant:
Neiman Marcus
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Ryan Abair v. Neiman Marcus et al
as 2:2026cv03662
Plaintiff:
Ryan Abair
Defendant:
Neiman Marcus and DOES 1 to 500, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Drop It Modern, Inc. v. Carve Media, Inc. et al
as 2:2026cv03342
Plaintiff:
Drop It Modern, Inc.
Defendant:
Carve Media, Inc., Grayson Living, Living Spaces Furniture, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Ryan Abair v. Neiman Marcus et al
as 5:2026cv01335
Plaintiff:
Ryan Abair
Defendant:
Neiman Marcus, 1stDibs, 24S and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Middleton v. Neiman Marcus Group et al
as 2:2026cv00700
Plaintiff:
Patrick Middleton
Defendant:
Neiman Marcus Group and Saks Global
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Employment Discrimination under A.D.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv01298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
