Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Worman v. Barasse,Esq et al
as 3:2023cv01488
Plaintiff: Yvonne Worman
Defendant: Nancy Barasse,Esq, John Henry "Shane" Scanlon,Esq, Ruth Borland,Esq and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brethren Mutual Insurance Company v. Fuel On Bloomsburg Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01031
Plaintiff: Brethren Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant: Fuel On Bloomsburg Inc. d/b/a Fuel on Truck Plaza, Mann Corp. and NEPA Trading & Investments LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC v. A Permanent Easement of 0.48 Acre +, A Permanent Facilities Easement of 0.07 Acre +, and A Temporary Easement of 0.07 Acre + in Dallas Township, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, Tax Parcel No. 10-D8-00A- et al
as 3:2019cv00466
Defendant: Regency NEPA Gas Gathering LLC, All Unknown Owners and A Permanent Easement of 0.48 Acre +, A Permanent Facilities Easement of 0.07 Acre +, and A Temporary Easement of 0.07 Acre + in Dallas Township, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, Tax Parcel No. 10-D8-00A-
Plaintiff: PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Hanko v. Attri et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv01322
Defendant: Aspen Dental Associates of NEPA, PLLC, DDS Neelam Attri and Aspen Dental Management, Inc.
Plaintiff: Joseph Hanko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00669
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Ellsworth Pendleton v. NEPA Community Federal Credit, et al
as 08-2408
Plaintiff - Appellant: ELLSWORTH PENDLETON
Defendant - Appellee: SEC OF STATE COMM PA
Defendant: NEPA COMMUNITY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION & BD OF DIRECTORS and OAKVIEW TERRACE CONDO ASSOCIATION & BD OF DIRECTORS, ET AL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?