Cases 31 - 37 of 37
Nepa Transport BV v. Hans Schramm & Sohn GMBH & CO. KG et al
as 1:2009cv07394
Plaintiff:
Nepa Transport BV
Defendant:
Hans Schramm & Sohn GMBH & CO. KG and Nostag GMBH & CO.KG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Nepa Projects & Investments Limited v. Kyodo Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv05118
Plaintiff:
Nepa Projects & Investments Limited and Nepa Projects & Investments Limited
Defendant:
Kyodo Corporation, Kyodo Shipping Limited and Progress Shipping Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Nepa Projects & Investments Limited v. Kyodo Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv05118
Plaintiff:
Nepa Projects & Investments Limited and Nepa Projects & Investments Limited
Defendant:
Kyodo Corporation, Kyodo Shipping Limited and Progress Shipping Limited
Garnishee:
The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. New York Branch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Puget Soundkeeper Alliance v. NEPA Pallet and Container Co. Inc
as 2:2008cv01791
Plaintiff:
Puget Soundkeeper Alliance and Puget Soundkeeper Alliance
Defendant:
NEPA Pallet and Container Co. Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ellsworth Pendleton v. NEPA Community Federal Credit, et al
as 08-2408
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELLSWORTH PENDLETON
Defendant - Appellee:
SEC OF STATE COMM PA
Defendant:
NEPA COMMUNITY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION & BD OF DIRECTORS and OAKVIEW TERRACE CONDO ASSOCIATION & BD OF DIRECTORS, ET AL
Nepa Shipping B.V. et al v. Jinghua Rizhao Steel Group International Trade Co. et al
as 1:2007cv06081
Plaintiff:
Nepa Shipping B.V. and Nepa Transport B.V.
Defendant:
Jinghua Rizhao Steel Group International Trade Co., Rizhao Steel Co., Ltd. and Fame Risen Development Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Hudson Corporation, A.G. v. Med-Asia Shipping (HK) Ltd. et al
as 1:2007cv05589
Plaintiff:
Hudson Corporation, A.G.
Defendant:
Med-Asia Shipping (HK) Ltd., Med-Asia Shipping Ltd. and Nepa Shipping Agency (HK) Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
