Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Hines et al v. Skull & Bones Associations et al
as 3:2022cv00653
Plaintiff:
Marquese Hines and Telly Hines
Defendant:
Skull & Bones Associations, Bridgeport Hospital/Yale New Haven Hospital and New Haven Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Wilkes v. New Haven Police Dept et al
as 3:2020cv00116
Defendant:
New Haven Police Dept and New Haven Court House
Plaintiff:
George Wilkes
Edwards v. Baptiste et al
as 3:2011cv00160
Plaintiff:
Charles Edwards
Defendant:
Jean Baptiste, John A. Keyes, Shirley Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maye v. Durkin et al
as 3:2010cv00194
Plaintiff:
Solomon D. Maye
Defendant:
S. Durkin, McArthur, Bullock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008mc00383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Richardson v. New Haven Police Dept et al
as 3:2008cv00438
Plaintiff:
Jewu Richardson
Defendant:
New Haven Police Dept, City of New Haven, Justen Kasperzyk and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Oliphant v. Villano et al
as 3:2007cv01435
Plaintiff:
Vorcelia Oliphant
Defendant:
R. Villano, Mark Sheppard, Hamden Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Oliphant v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2007cv01433
Petitioner:
Anthony Oliphant
Respondent:
State of Connecticut, Hamden Police Dept, New Haven Police Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Livingston v. Sweeny et al
as 3:2007cv01261
Plaintiff:
Larry Livingston
Defendant:
Rebecca Sweeny and New Haven Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
