Cases
HINES v. NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE et al
as 3:2024cv00428
Plaintiff: KENNETH T. HINES
Defendant: NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE and VICTORIA L. KUHN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. THE NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE et al
as 1:2023cv22771
Plaintiff: WALTER M. WILLIAMS
Defendant: THE NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, VICTORIA L. KUHN and KEISHA FISHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SUNG v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv11960
Plaintiff: JEFFREY SUNG
Defendant: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, HUDSON COUNTY PROSECUTOR OFFICE, WEST NEW YORK POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. SATAN GOD et al
as 2:2016cv00079
Plaintiff: KEVIN ROGERS
Defendant: SATAN GOD, BARAK OBAMA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv09734
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Consumer Financial Protection, et al v. OCWEN Financial Corporation, et al
as 14-5265
Plaintiff - Appellee: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, State of Alabama, Alabama Attorney General's Office, State of Alaska, Alaska Attorney General's Office and others
Defendant - Appellee: OCWEN Financial Corporation and OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLC
Movant - Appellant: Christopher Stoller
HOHSFIELD v. CALDWELL et al
as 2:2012cv03480
Plaintiff: DAVID HOHSFIELD
Defendant: CORY CALDWELL, JOHN DOES 1-10 and NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POLANCO v. NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE et al
as 2:2012cv00778
Plaintiff: EMILIO J. POLANCO
Defendant: NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, JEFFREY S. CHIESA, CHRISTOPHER MUSCIANESI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?