Cases 1 - 10 of 13
GENERAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF DETROIT v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al
as 3:2023cv05218
Petitioner:
GEORGE MEEHAN, Stichting Pensioenfonds Metaal en Techniek, Stichting Pensioenfonds van de Metalektro and others
Plaintiff:
GENERAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF DETROIT
Defendant:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., HANS VESTBERG and MATTHEW ELLIS
General Retirement System of the City of Detroit v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07351
Plaintiff:
General Retirement System of the City of Detroit
Defendant:
AT&T Inc., John Stankey, Randall L. Stephenson and others
Petitioner:
Velliv, Pension & Livsforsikring A/S, Bridget N. Smagala Revocable Trust U/A DTD, New Mexico State Investment Council and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
BRAZINSKY v. AT&T INC. et al
as 2:2023cv04064
Plaintiff:
JOHN BRAZINSKY
Defendant:
AT&T INC., RANDALL L. STEPHENSON, JOHN T. STANKEY and others
Petitioner:
GENERAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF DETROIT, BRIDGET N. SMAGALA REVOCABLE TRUST U/A DTD, SURESH KODALI and others
Vega v. Energy Transfer LP et al
as 3:2022cv02735
Plaintiff:
Mike Vega and Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit
Defendant:
Energy Transfer LP, Kelcy L Warren, Thomas E Long and others
Petitioner:
Josephine Dameyer, New Mexico State Investment Council and Public Employees Retirement Association of New Mexico
Sun v. TAL Education Group et al
as 1:2022cv01015
Plaintiff:
Ruoshui Sun
Defendant:
TAL Education Group, Bangxin Zhang, Rong Luo and others
Petitioner:
Macy Ganji, Potrero LLC, The Public Employees Retirement System of Mississippi and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
New Mexico State Investment Council
Lead Plaintiff:
New Mexico State Investment Counsel and Public Employees' Retirment System of Mississippi
New Mexico State Investment Council v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00606
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley Capital Services, LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff:
New Mexico State Investment Council, Public Employees Retirement Association of New Mexico and New Mexico Educational Retirement Board
In Re:
Credit Default Swaps Auctions Litigation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
OPENED IN ERROR
as 1:2021cv00605
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley Capital Services, LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff:
New Mexico State Investment Council
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
James Erickson, et al v. Snap Inc., et al
as 19-80157
Defendant:
WILLIAM BLAIR & COMPANY, LLC, CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC., LUMA SECURITIES, LLC and others
Petitioner:
DAVID SPRING, D.D.S., TOM DIBIASE, STATE OF NEW MEXICO, on behalf of New Mexico State Investment Council and others
Plaintiff:
SHINU GUPTA, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and DAVID STEINBERG
Not Yet Classified:
SMILKA MELGOZA, as trustee of the Smilka Melgoza Trust U/A DTD, JAMES ERICKSON, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, DONALD R. ALLEN and others
Intervenor:
WEI C. HSIEH and CHENGHSIN D. HSIEH
Gianardi v. New Mexico State Investment Council
as 1:2018cv00948
Plaintiff:
Anita Gianardi
Defendant:
New Mexico State Investment Council
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Smokestack Lightening Ltd,, et al v. New Mexico State Investment Co, et al
as 10-56436
Plaintiff:
SONAM BAKSHI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, BAKERS LOCAL NO. 433 PENSION FUND, MINNESOTA BAKERS UNION PENSION FUND and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NEW MEXICO STATE INVESTMENT COUNCIL, Lead Plaintiff
Objector - Appellant:
SMOKESTACK LIGHTENING LTD "MARISCO"
Defendant:
HENRY SAMUELI, WILLIAM J. RUEHLE, DAVID A. DULL and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BROADCOM CORPORATION
Movant:
JUSTIN SHENKAROW, STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF OHIO and LECG, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
