Cases 81 - 90 of 274
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-30813
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Seaside TGH BR RE 1, LLC v. New Orleans City
as 2:2017cv09892
Plaintiff:
Seaside TGH BR RE 1, LLC
Defendant:
New Orleans City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Brunson v. New Orleans City et al
as 2:2017cv09853
Plaintiff:
Burton G. Brunson
Defendant:
New Orleans City, Mitchell J. Landrieu, Professional Account Management LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv09808
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grant v. Gusman et al
as 2:2017cv08703
Plaintiff:
Joseph Grant
Defendant:
Marlin N. Gusman , Chaz Ruiz, Keriana Alexcee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crutchfield et al v. New Orleans City et al
as 2:2017cv08562
Plaintiff:
Wade Crutchfield , Ronda Crutchfield and Diane Crutchfield
Defendant:
Mitchell J. Landrieu , New Orleans City , Stacy Head and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lourdes Archbold-Garrett, et al v. New Orleans City, et al
as 17-30692
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOURDES T. ARCHBOLD-GARRETT, wife of/ and and DAVID L. GARRETT
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW ORLEANS CITY and METRO DURR GROUP
Dean v. United States Department of Highways et al
as 2:2017cv07672
Plaintiff:
Darryl Dean
Defendant:
United States Department of Highways and Department of Public Works New Orleans City
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Hammerman & Gainer, Inc. v. New Orleans City et al
as 2:2017cv04780
Plaintiff:
Hammerman & Gainer, Inc.
Defendant:
New Orleans City and CorVel Enterprise Comp, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shepherd v. Fanning et al
as 2:2017cv02694
Plaintiff:
Deborah A. Shepherd
Defendant:
Patrick Fanning , New Orleans City , Anthony J Caprera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
